Legal Opinion

Tallapoosa Lumber Co. v. Copeland

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 14, 1931No. 6 Div. 787PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

Complainant, Tallapoosa Lumber Company, seeks to have a lien declared and enforced for materials furnished for buildings on lots 3, 4, and 6 according to the survey of South Park in Jefferson county. The numbered lots, each fronting fifty feet on a street, were at the time of the contract for the materials in question the property of appellee Roy Copeland. Before the bill was filed, the several lots had passed into the ownership of different persons who are made parties defendant to the bill and have suffered decrees pro confesso. The cause proceeded to moneyed decree against appellee…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grimsley v. First Ave. Coal & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. First Avenue Coal & Lumber Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  3. Richardson Lumber Co. v. HowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Wahouma Sav. Bank v. Southern Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1929

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Richards v. William Beach Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  2. Snellings Lumber Co. v. PorterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Eatman v. NuckolsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  4. City Realty & Mortgage Co. v. Tallapoosa Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. In Re Apportionment of Clinton County-1991Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API