Snellings Lumber Co. v. Porter
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The demurrer to the bill as amended was sustained, and complainant was given an opportunity to amend. Failing to amend within the time extended by the decree, the cause was dismissed for want of prosecution and complainant was taxed with the costs.
From this final decree the appeal was prosecuted. De Graffenried v. Breitling, 192 Ala. 254, 68 So. 265.
The bill was filed under section S832 et seq. of the Code, to enforce a mechanic’s and materialman’s lien.
The demurrer contained the ground, among others, that the verified statement claiming the lien was prematurely filed, in that it was filed…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Grimsley v. First Ave. Coal & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- de Graffenried v. BreitlingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Reeder v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Lane & Bodley Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Welch v. Porter & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1879
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bankers' Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. SlossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Emanuel v. Underwood Coal & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Fowler v. MacKentepeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Richards v. William Beach Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co., Inc. v. AMERICAN COUNTRY CLUB INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.