In Re Apportionment of Clinton County-1991
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
This petition for review of a newly adopted apportionment plan for the Board of Commissioners of Clinton County comes before this Court for review pursuant to MCL 46.406; MSA 5.359(6). This Court by our order of January 23, 1992, struck down the plan initially adopted, because one district consisted of several townships, two of which touched only at a corner, holding that the plan violated the contiguity requirement of MCL 46.404(b); MSA 5.359(4)(b). 1 This Court remanded to the Clinton County Apportionment Commission for the presentation of a new plan to this Court within ten days,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- City of Mobile v. BoldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Gaffney v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Chisom v. RoemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Davis v. BandemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Karcher v. DaggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Apportionment of Wayne County-2001Michigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- In Re Apportionment of Wayne County-2001Michigan Court of Appeals · 2002