Legal Opinion

In Re Apportionment of Clinton County-1991

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 1992No. Docket 145250PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This petition for review of a newly adopted apportionment plan for the Board of Commissioners of Clinton County comes before this Court for review pursuant to MCL 46.406; MSA 5.359(6). This Court by our order of January 23, 1992, struck down the plan initially adopted, because one district consisted of several townships, two of which touched only at a corner, holding that the plan violated the contiguity requirement of MCL 46.404(b); MSA 5.359(4)(b). 1 This Court remanded to the Clinton County Apportionment Commission for the presentation of a new plan to this Court within ten days,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. City of Mobile v. BoldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Gaffney v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Chisom v. RoemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Davis v. BandemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Karcher v. DaggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Apportionment of Wayne County-2001Michigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. In Re Apportionment of Wayne County-2001Michigan Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API