Legal Opinion

City Realty & Mortgage Co. v. Tallapoosa Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 17, 1935No. 6 Div. 599PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

The bill was filed by Tallapoosa Lumber Company, appellee, to enforce a material-man’s lien in solido on three lots, Nos. 3, 4, and 6, and the buildings .erected thereon.

On former appeal (Tallapoosa Lumber Co. v. Copeland, 223 Ala. 41, 134 So. 658, 75 A. L. R. 1325) we held the record sufficiently disclosed the materials were furnished the owner, Roy Copeland, under one contract for use in the several buildings under construction at the same time, and that same were so used; that the lots were “contiguous or adjacent,” notwithstanding a 50-foot lot, No. 5, under separate…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Baker Sand & Gravel Co. v. Rogers Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  2. Tallapoosa Lumber Co. v. CopelandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fowler v. MacKentepeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Gautney v. GautneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  3. John Lee Paint Co. v. Parktowne, Ltd.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  4. Douthit v. WilksCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  5. Morris v. Swope Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API