Legal Opinion

People v. Howell

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 25, 2013No. Docket No. 300405PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant, Marlon Jermell Howell, appeals as on leave granted1 the trial court’s order denying his motion for relief from judgment2 after the trial court amended his judgments of sentence to indicate that he must serve his new sentences consecutively to a previous parole sentence, as required by law. We affirm.

I. FACTS

A. THE SENTENCING AGREEMENTS

The prosecution charged Howell in three separate cases for offenses that he committed while he was on parole. For an arson that occurred on August 30, 2006, it charged Howell with six counts of assault with intent to commit murder, arson of a dwelling…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. People v. MoreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  4. People v. ColeMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  5. People v. BuieMichigan Supreme Court · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People of Michigan v. Alan Duane LewinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. People of Michigan v. David Henry JohnsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. People of Michigan v. Dionte Marquis FizerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. People of Michigan v. Eric John RydzewskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. People of Michigan v. Joshua Lee DufekMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API