Legal Opinion

People v. Williams

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 2006No. Docket 126956PublishedCited by 159 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.

The 180-day rule, codified in MCL 780.131, provides that a prison inmate who has a pending criminal charge must be tried within 180 days after the Department of Corrections delivers to the prosecutor notice of the inmate’s imprisonment and requests disposition of the pending charge. In People v Smith, 438 Mich 715, 717-718 (LEVIN, J.), 719 (BOYLE, J.); 475 NW2d 333 (1991), this Court held that the 180-day rule does not apply when the pending charge provides for mandatory consecutive sentencing. In the instant case, the trial court initially dismissed the charges against defendant on the basis…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. People v. CornellMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  5. McDougall v. SchanzMichigan Supreme Court · 1999

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by159 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. People v. DuenazMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Paige v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Petersen v. Magna Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  5. People v. LownMichigan Supreme Court · 2011

154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API