Ambridge Borough v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, P. J.,
The vital question involved in this appeal is whether a borough which supplies water to its inhabitants from its own water plant, and in connection therewith furnishes water to consumers outside the borough, residing or doing business in a township abutting thereon, (1) may establish a rate schedule for the consumers in the township different from that used in the borough, based upon the specific investment in the township and the allocation of a proper proportion of general plant investment, in arriving at the rate base, and a similar division and allocation of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shirk v. Lancaster CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Barnes Laundry Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Borough of Ambridge, Appel. v. P.S.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Cheltenham & Abington Sewerage Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Reigle v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Action Alliance of Senior Citizens of Greater Philadelphia, Inc. v. Philadelphia Gas CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Platt v. Town of TorreyUtah Supreme Court · 1997
- Inland Real Estate Corp. v. Village of PalatineAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Manufacturers' Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.