Legal Opinion

Noblin v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 2, 1940No. 29250PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff was a widow and had resided on the premises which she owned as her homestead for a number of years. She traded this homestead to the defendants, Nelce Noblin and Katie Noblin, for a plot of land owned by them and deeds were executed in evidence of such transaction and delivered to the defendants, Nelce Noblin and Katie Noblin, who had them recorded.

On the 29th day of November, 1937, plaintiff filed her action to cancel the deed executed by her. Nelce Noblin and his wife were made parties defendant. Irvin McClellan was also made party defendant. At the conclusion of the trial to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bruner Et Ux. v. CobbSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Marshall v. GraysonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Barker v. WisemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Clark v. O'TooleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Littlefield v. AikenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  2. Ferrero v. SielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  3. Rance v. SPERRY AND HUTCHINSON COMPANYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  4. Roddy v. RoddySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  5. Hulbert v. GivensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API