Legal Opinion

Littlefield v. Aiken

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 3, 1928No. 18062PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

The defendant in error began this action for rescission and cancellation of a deed executed by her whereby she conveyed, to plaintiff in error, Minnie I. Littlefield, one-half of her undivided one-half interest in four hundred acres of land located in LeElore county for a consideration of $5,250, of which amount $1,250 was paid at the date of delivery of the deed, September, 1924, and the balance by the execution and delivery of a promissory note, which was made payable four years from the date of delivery with interest from maturity. A tender to defendant of the consideration paid was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Maxwell Land-Grant CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Atlantic Delaine Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Moore v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Rogers v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Owen v. United States Surety Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hall Jones Oil Corporation v. ClaroSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  2. Bras v. First Bank & Trust Co. of Sand SpringsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  3. Nutt v. CarsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  4. Hembree v. DouglasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Thompson v. TeelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API