Legal Opinion
Rance v. SPERRY AND HUTCHINSON COMPANY
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 13, 1965No. 40423PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRWIN, Justice.
The Sperry and Hutchinson Company, referred to as plaintiff, is engaged in the trading stamp business and by written contract, it licenses the use of its S&H trading stamp service to certain retail merchants, referred to as licensees. The licensees offer and issue the stamps to their customers when the customers purchase merchandise at the licensees’ places of business. The customers who receive the stamps will be referred to as collectors.
William Ranee and Ruth V. Ranee, ■d/b/a Trading Stamps Exchange, referred to as defendants, buy and sell S&H stamps, exchange S&H stamps for…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Lorain Journal Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Henry v. A. B. Dick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Packard Motor Car Company v. The Webster Motor Car Company, the Webster Motor Car Company v. Packard Motor Car CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. Director of the Division on the Necessaries of LifeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Neil v. Pennsylvania Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Neal v. Pennsylvania Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Eastex Aviation, Inc. v. Sperry & Hutchinson CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1973
- Opinion No. (1998), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1998