Legal Opinion

State v. Swibies

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 28, 2002No. 9908-36074; A109556PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for possession and delivery of a controlled substance. He assigns error to the denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained after he was stopped during the execution of a search warrant. We reverse and remand.

Richard Ness was suspected of being an “upper level” cocaine dealer. Oregon State Police officers had made controlled buys from both Ness’s home and his business next door. Based on those buys and their surveillance of his home and business, they concluded that “numerous persons were coming and going” to purchase controlled substances from him.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. FordOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. CockeOregon Supreme Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. MaddenOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. State v. HendricksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  5. State v. HitchcockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API