Legal Opinion

City of Milwaukee v. Berry

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1969No. 161PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.

Berry contends the finding of speeding is against the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence because the police officer who testified against him did not have sufficient time and was not in a proper position to make an observation of Berry’s speed and consequently, his testimony of speed had no probative value or at least not enough to meet the burden of proof. Only the police officer and Berry testified at the trial.

On July 26, 1968, about 2:30 a. m. Berry was riding his motorcycle east on Burleigh street in the city of Milwaukee between North Eighth and North Third streets.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wells v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  2. City of Madison v. GeierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Finger v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Fringer v. VenemaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Culver v. WebbWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Kansas City v. OxleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  2. Millonig v. BakkenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Bennett v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. ChambersNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Quinlan v. CoombsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API