Legal Opinion
Fringer v. Venema
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided February 2, 1965PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
Plaintiffs base their cause of action upon sec. 172.01, Stats.:
"Animals not to run at large. No stallion over one year old, nor bull over six months old, nor boar, nor ram, nor billy goat over four months old shall run at large; and if the owner or keeper shall,- for any reason, suffer any such animal so to do he shall forfeit five dollars to the person taking it up and be liable in addition for all damages done by such animal *370while so at large, although he escapes without the fault of such owner or keeper; and the construction of any fence enumerated in section 90.02 shall not relieve such…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wells v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Gilson v. Drees Bros.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Ritholz v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- McCarty v. WeberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Reichert v. Rex Accessories Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Wisconsin Auto Title Loans, Inc. v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Life of the Land v. CITY COUNCIL, ETC.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980
- Kobelinski v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Finger v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.