Legal Opinion

Finger v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1968No. State 72PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

When, following a trial before the court, defendant fails to make either a motion for a new trial or a motion to set aside the verdict, is he entitled to a review of the sufficiency of the evidence in this court

The defendant concedes that, following the court’s finding of guilty and the imposition of sentence, he failed to move for a new trial or to set aside the verdict on the grounds of the insufficiency of the evidence. The general rule adopted by this court is that a review of the evidence will not be conducted on appeal or on a writ of error as a matter of right unless these motions have…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wells v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Gauthier v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State v. BrodsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Jung v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State v. TuttleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. McCleary v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Scales v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State v. TewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Holmes v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Rahhal v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API