Legal Opinion

Underhill v. Anciaux

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1951No. 3615PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Merrill, J.:

This is an appeal from judgment of the Eighth judicial district court of the State of Nevada in and for the county of Clark, in favor of respondent, plaintiff below, in the sum of $798 plus costs, and from order denying motion for new trial.

The evidence and pleadings disclose the following facts:

Appellants (defendants below) are engaged in the business of manufacturing, bottling and wholesale-selling of Coca Cola. Respondent and her husband, on April 18, 1948, bought a case of Coca Cola at a store which, in turn, bought the beverage exclusively from appellants.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Fredrickson & Watson Construction Co v. BoydNevada Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad v. UmbaughNevada Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Dryden v. Continental Baking Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Fort Worth v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Northrip v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  2. Shoshone Coca-Cola Bottling Company v. DolinskiNevada Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Thompson v. Burke Engineering Sales Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  4. Long v. Flanigan Warehouse CompanyNevada Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Tafoya v. Las Cruces Coca-Cola Bottling CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API