Legal Opinion

Dryden v. Continental Baking Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1938No. Sac. 5160PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

This was an action for damages for personal injuries to plaintiff alleged to have resulted from eating bread manufactured by defendants and in which particles of glass were imbedded. In the original complaint it was alleged that the bread had been purchased by plaintiff. During the trial, it developed that plaintiff’s husband was the actual purchaser, and it was ordered that the complaint be amended to conform to the proof in that respect. The amended complaint set forth two causes of action, one based on breach of warranty and the other charging negligence, and prayed for damages in the sum…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sloane v. Southern California Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Rozumailski v. Philadelphia Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Lindley v. KnowltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Binion v. SasakiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Di Mare v. CresciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Klein v. Duchess Sandwich Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Vaccarezza v. SanguinettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Rubino v. Utah Canning Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API