Legal Opinion

Nunnery v. Baucom

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 16, 1999No. COA98-841PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN, Judge.

Defendants appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for new trial (defendants’ motion). We find no reversible error.

Pertinent facts and procedural history include the following: On 15 November 1991, plaintiff Pamela Nunnery and defendant Eric Jonathan Baucom (Baucom) were each traveling eastbound on Rural Paved Road 2665 in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. Baucom was operating an automobile registered to defendant Baucom’s Nursery Company. Two vehicles separated those being operated by plaintiff and Baucom.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. ConawaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  2. Robinson v. Seaboard System RR, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Lumbee River Electric Membership Corp. v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Heatherly v. Industrial Health CouncilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bass v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. State v. CarrCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Morin v. SharpCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. Warren v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. Joines v. MoffittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API