Legal Opinion
Huff v. Mendoza
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 26, 1980No. Civ. 57154PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WENKE, J. *
Appellant Larry S. Huff (hereinafter referred to as Huff) has appealed from a judgment of the trial court dismissing his first amended complaint after sustaining a general demurrer without leave to amend.
In 1975 a default judgment was rendered against Huff and in favor of respondents Ruben Mendoza and Rose Mendoza (hereinafter referred to as Mendoza) in the Superior Court of the State of Arizona. Ruben Mendoza had been injured while a spectator at a motorcycle race in August of 1974. In that action it was alleged that Huff had an agency or partnership relationship with one…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Olivera v. GraceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- State v. McCarrellArizona Supreme Court · 1956
- Gilmer v. SpitalnyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Skouland v. SkoulandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Rose v. FuquaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Groves v. PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Rohrbasser v. LedererCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Fehlhaber v. FehlhaberCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Fehlhaber v. FehlhaberCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Rohrbasser v. LedererCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.