Legal Opinion

Rohrbasser v. Lederer

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 27, 1986No. B009224PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THOMPSON, J.

In this cross-action for fraud, breach of contract, and declaratory relief against cross-defendant, Les E. Lederer, cross-complainant, Daniel M. Rohrbasser, appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court granted the motion of cross-defendant for summary judgment. The principal issue presented by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in determining that the cross-complaint is barred by the doctrine of res judicata. We answer this question in the affirmative and conclude that the judgment should be reversed.

Statement of Facts

In order to understand the facts of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Olivera v. GraceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. People v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Bacon v. BaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Barker v. HullCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. Allstate Insurance v. Mel Rapton, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Whittlesey v. AielloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Groves v. PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Ayala v. Dawson, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API