Legal Opinion

Gilmer v. Spitalny

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 27, 1948No. Civ. 3583PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

On March 22, 1945, the plaintiffs recovered a judgment in Arizona against the defendants, husband and wife, the material part reading as follows:

“The above-entitled matter having been submitted on motions for judgment on the pleadings . . . and the Court finding that judgment should be entered in favor of plaintiffs as upon a community debt of the defendants incurred by the defendant Sam Spitalny. It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that plaintiffs have and recover the sum of ($2,974.14 with interest from November 9, 1939) from the defendants as a community debt of the defendants…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Abbey Land & Improvement Co. v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Culp v. CulpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  3. First National Bank v. TerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Harding v. HardingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Seligman v. KalkmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Martin v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Farley v. FarleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Juneau Spruce Corp. v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's UnionDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1955
  4. Weir v. CorbettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Huff v. MendozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API