Frank v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 24234 (T. D. 31103).
1Opinion of the CourtMaetin, Judge
In the year 1909, after the present tariff act went into effect, the appellants imported from Germany a consignment of earthenware cooking utensils known as carmelite ware. The articles were small bowls, casseroles, etc., made of a superior quality of finely ground clay. There are two exhibits filed in the case, one being a small pudding dish, the other being a shirred-egg dish, and these are said to be similar in character to the other articles included within the importation.
The collector held that the merchandise fell within the provisions of paragraph 94 of the act, and was therefore…
2Cited by7 opinions
- States v. StrausCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- United States v. Maine Central RailroadCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- Stegemann v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- United States v. BernardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Richard v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.