Legal Opinion

Richard v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 22, 1912No. 747PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 26244 (T. D. 31804).

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

This appeal raises the question as to the classification of certain china or porcelain spark plugs which were imported at the port of New York and assessed for duty by the collector of customs at 60 per cent ad valorem as “china, printed” under the provisions of paragraph 93 of the tariff act of 1909, which paragraph reads as follows:

93. China, porcelain, parian, bisque, earthen, stone and crockery ware, including clock cases with or without movements, pill tiles, plaques, ornaments, toys, charms, vases, statues, statuettes, mugs, cups, steins, and lamps, all the foregoing wholly or in chief…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Frank v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. BernardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. Golding-Keene Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  3. Richard v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API