Citgo Refining and Marketing, Inc. v. Garza
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice CASTILLO.
This is an attempted appeal from an interlocutory order of the trial court following a non-jury trial on the merits in a class action. The challenged order approved notice to two previously certified subclasses of a damages award in the plaintiffs’ favor, of class counsel’s request for expenses and attorneys’ fees, and of a proposed distribution of the anticipated judgment. Appellants, Citgo Refining and Marketing, Inc. and Citgo Petroleum Corporation (jointly, “Citgo”), contend in two issues that: (1) the order either certified a new class or fundamentally…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- North East Independent School District v. AldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Padilla v. LaFranceTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Cherokee Water Co. v. RossTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Mantas v. Fifth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fleming v. Ahumada, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
- Salmonsen v. CGD, INC.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Phillips Petroleum Company, Gpm Gas Corporation, Phillips Gas Marketing Company, Phillips Gas Company, and Gpm Gas Trading Company v. Royce YarbroughTexas Supreme Court · 2013
- Citgo Refining & Marketing, Inc. v. Garza, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
- Charles O. "Chuck" Grigson, Gerald Hooks, and Leslie Hooks v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.