Legal Opinion

Huth v. Woodard

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 11, 1958No. 4759PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

Plaintiff filed her petition against defendant Woodard, as sheriff, and Clifford, a special deputy sheriff, and their bondsmen, seeking, under a first cause of action, the recovery of $25,000 for malicious prosecution; and, under a second cause of action, $5,000 for assault and battery, allegedly committed upon plaintiff by the deputy, Clifford.

Answers were filed by both defendants, and the surety company of each, but no written motion, demurrer, or answer of defendants challenged the propriety of the joinder of the two causes of action, or of the several defendants.

Trial was had, and, at the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bock v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Hanratty v. GodfreyOhio Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. State, Ex Rel. Geyer v. GriffinOhio Court of Appeals · 1946
  4. City of Columbus v. HolmesOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. King v. MagawOhio Court of Appeals · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. JordanDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1981
  2. City of Cincinnati v. O'NealOhio Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. Commonwealth v. Herjeczki, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County1972
  4. State v. CrockettCincinnati Municipal Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API