Legal Opinion

Bock v. City of Cincinnati

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 6, 1931PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, PJ.

The officers had no search warrant, nor is there any evidence that either one of the officers had the slightest reason or cause, probable or otherwise,. or any reasonable ground to believe that Bock was in any way violating the law, before they entered his place of business.

In the Tapp case the defendant was observed by one of the officers, by George W. Galbraith, who made the arrest in the Bock case, standing in the lobby of an office building in the basement of which is the terminal for the Kentucky street cars. The officer testified that he saw three men approach Tapp, say…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Amos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Byars v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Dawson v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. People v. KilvingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Coverstone v. DaviesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Cave v. CooleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Ryan v. ConoverOhio Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Edvon v. MoralesOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Morrison v. Horseshoe CasinoOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API