Housing Land Advocates v. LCDC
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
326 Argued and submitted March 8, affirmed May 12, 2021 HOUSING LAND ADVOCATES, Petitioner, v. LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, Metro, City of Hillsboro, City of Wilsonville, City of Beaverton, and City of King City, Respondents. Land Conservation and Development Commission 20UGB001910; A173406
492 P3d 765
Petitioner seeks judicial review of an order of the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) approving an expansion of Metro’s Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). The gravamen of petitioner’s claim is that LCDC’s decision approving the expansion of Metro’s UGB was “unlawful…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Don't Waste Oregon Committee v. Energy Facility Siting CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Portland v. DollarhideOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- LandWatch Lane County v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024