Legal Opinion

Housing Land Advocates v. LCDC

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 12, 2021No. A173406PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

326 Argued and submitted March 8, affirmed May 12, 2021 HOUSING LAND ADVOCATES, Petitioner, v. LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, Metro, City of Hillsboro, City of Wilsonville, City of Beaverton, and City of King City, Respondents. Land Conservation and Development Commission 20UGB001910; A173406

492 P3d 765

Petitioner seeks judicial review of an order of the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) approving an expansion of Metro’s Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). The gravamen of petitioner’s claim is that LCDC’s decision approving the expansion of Metro’s UGB was “unlawful…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Don't Waste Oregon Committee v. Energy Facility Siting CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. City of Portland v. DollarhideOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. LandWatch Lane County v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API