Legal Opinion
Saltonstall v. City of Sacramento
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 20, 2014No. C077031PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOCH, J.
The Sacramento Kings, a professional basketball team, have played at the Sleep Train Arena (formerly called Arco Arena) since 1988. In January 2013, the team’s then owners entered into a tentative agreement to sell the Sacramento Kings to a group of investors in Seattle, Washington. Seeking to keep the team in Sacramento, the City of Sacramento (City) partnered with Sacramento Basketball Holdings, LLC, to build a new entertainment and sports center in downtown Sacramento at the site of a shopping mall with declining occupancy rates. In May 2013, the Board of Governors of the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Moore v. OgilvieSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- People v. PartidaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Tobe v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Marzec v. Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Saltonstall v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Citizens Oversight, Inc. v. Vu, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Wilde v. City of Dunsmuir, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- A&B Market Plus, Inc. v. Arabo CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.