Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hutton v. LAW OFFICES OF COLLINS & LAMORE

District Court, S.D. California

Decided November 9, 2009No. Case 09CV0752-LAB (CAB)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

LARRY ALAN BURNS, District Judge.

Chris Hutton alleges that the Law Offices of Collins & Lamore attempted to collect a debt in a manner that violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) and the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Specifically, Hutton claims that a dunning letter he received from Collins & Lamore demanded an amount of $22,519.17 but some unknown or confusing amount of interest, and therefore failed to include the total amount of the debt as required by law. Now before the Court is Collins & La-more’s motion to dismiss.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Warren v. Fox Family Worldwide, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kalebaugh v. Berman & Rabin, P.A.District Court, D. Kansas · 2014
  2. Donohue v. NielsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  3. Donohue v. NielsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  4. Gross v. Judge CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Maclean v. Collection Bureau of America, LTD.District Court, S.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API