Legal Opinion
Warren v. Fox Family Worldwide, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 13, 2003No. 01-57107PublishedCited by 389 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge.
In this dispute between plaintiff-appellant Richard Warren (‘Warren”) and defendants-appellees Fox Family Worldwide (“Fox”), MTM Productions (“MTM”),1 Princess Cruise Lines (“Princess”), and the Christian Broadcasting Network (“CBN”), Warren claims that defendants infringed the copyrights in musical compositions he created for use in the television series “Remington Steele.” Concluding that Warren has no standing to sue for infringement because he is neither the legal nor beneficial owner of the copyrights in question, we affirm the district court’s Rule 12…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- White v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Steckman v. Hart Brewing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by389 opinions
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Maya v. Centex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Marder v. LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- The Cetacean Community v. George W. Bush, President of the United States of America Donald H. Rumsfeld, United States of America Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Sanders v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
384 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.