Koonce v. Mitchell
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Ray THORNTON, Justice.
This case involves a dispute ice. neighbors regarding the establishment of the boundary line between them. They each claim an interest in a strip of land fifteen-feet wide east and west, and one-hundred fifty feet north and south (hereinafter “the strip”) that separates their residential properties. The record owner of the strip has not been made a party to this litigation, and none of the parties to this litigation have any record title to the strip. The trial court attempted to resolve the dispute without joining the record owner of the strip. We reverse and dismiss…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Vanderpool v. Fidelity & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Priest v. PolkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Staggs v. StorySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
- Doe v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Gingles v. RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Walther v. FLIS Enters., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
- Norman v. NormanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Devine v. MartensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Bonds v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Fatpipe, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.