Daniel v. CITY OF ASHDOWN

Andree Layton Roaf, Judge.

In 2002, appellants Mary and Alan Daniel filed suit against appellee City of Ash-down, claiming that the city had taken their property by inverse condemnation. The City of Ashdown filed a counter-claim to quiet tide to the property. The trial court ruled that the Daniels’ claim was barred by the statute of limitations and that the City of Ashdown was entitled to the property, quieting title against the Daniels. On appeal, the Daniels argue that the trial court erred when it held that their inverse condemnation claim was barred. We affirm.

In May 1993, Mary Daniel…