Legal Opinion
United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. DiMaria
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 15, 2016No. 1:15-cv-7035-GHWPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge:
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) alleges that Defendants Edward DiMaria and Matthew Gamsey orchestrated and executed a scheme to artificially inflate Bankrate, Inc.’s (“Bankrate”) revenues and understate expenses, so that Bankrate would meet certain financial targets in the second quarter of 2012. DiMaria and Gamsey (together, “Defendants”) have each moved to dismiss the amended complaint, arguing that the allegedly improper accounting entries were not material and that the SEC has…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. WeyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Consumer Fin. Prot. Bureau v. RD Legal Funding, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. LIBERTYDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2021
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. FarnsworthDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. AT&T Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.