Cohen v. Goldberg
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the municipal court of Minneapolis, Holt, J., denying a motion for a new trial, after a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $242.
1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.
This is an action for conversion. Plaintiff had a verdict, and from an order denying a new trial the defendant appeals.,
K. Goldblum, a merchant at Minneapolis, sold a quantity of goods either to plaintiff, or one S. (or Sam) Sunel, but on the question of *474■which was the purchaser the evidence is conflicting. Goldblum shipped the goods to Madelia, in this state, and took a bill of lading in which he is named as consignee. This defendant held a money judgment against one Sam Shinnel, who, there is evidence tending to prove, was the same person as said Sunel, who was known by both names. After…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Nicolay v. MallerySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
3Cited by6 opinions
- Zuber v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Volusia County Bank v. BigelowSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
- National German-American Bank v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Manwaring v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Zeglin v. TetzlaffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.