Lands' End, Inc. v. City of Dodgeville
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceAnnette Kingsland Ziegler, J.
¶ 117. (concurring). I concur in the lead opinion's conclusion to affirm; I do not join the lead opinion's entire analysis.1 Although I agree with much of the lead opinion's analysis in this case, I write separately because I fear our jurisprudence on retroactive legislation is in the process of becoming unmoored from fundamental principles of constitutional law and statutory interpretation. For example, while the lead opinion cites specific factors pertinent to the instant case, it fails to anchor those factors to the overriding applicable principles. Therefore, I write to reemphasize the…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.