Wisconsin v. Laxton
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtN. Patrick Crooks, J.
¶ 1. This case involves a constitutional challenge to Wis. Stat. ch. 980 (1997-98)1, the sexually violent person commitment law. Petitioner John Lee Laxton, who was involuntarily committed to institutional care under ch. 980, argues that the statute is unconstitutional because it violates substantive due process guarantees in the United *189States and Wisconsin Constitutions. Specifically, Lax-ton argues that ch. 980 is unconstitutional because, in determining that an individual is sexually violent and subject to civil commitment, the provisions of the chapter do not require a jury to determine…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- State v. PostWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. CarpenterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Westerheide v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Van Grinsven v. G.R.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. WoodWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.