Legal Opinion

United States v. Dalminter, Inc.

United States Customs Court

Decided September 13, 1961No. A.R.D. 135; Entry Nos. 641-H; 29-HPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donlon, Judge:

Defendant below has appealed to us for review of the decision of Lawrence, J., reported as Dalminter, Inc., and R. W. Smith v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 620, Reap. Dec. 9938, in which two appeals for reappraisement were consolidated for purposes of trial.

The trial judge found that United States value (which was the basis of appraisement) was the proper basis for valuing certain seamless steel tubing, imported from Italy at the port of Houston, Tex. The trial judge found, however, that the amount of the United States values of this merchandise, as determined by the appraiser,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. CorriganUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  2. Corrigan v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. Alex Schechter Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  4. Dalminter, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  5. United States v. American Aniline Products, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Charles A. Koons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  2. Dalminter, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  3. Dalminter, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  4. Dalminter, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  5. Geo. Wm. Rueff, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API