Legal Opinion

Geo. Wm. Rueff, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 18, 1962No. Reap. Dec. 10402; Entry No. 3607Published

1Opinion of the Court

LawebNCE, Judge:

The above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement involves the proper value for dutiable purposes of certain steel tubing and casing.

The parties hereto have entered into a stipulation of fact wherein it has been agreed as follows:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for tbe parties hereto that tbe merchandise consists of seamless steel tubing and seamless steel easing, exported from Italy, and that tbe facts and tbe law are similar in all material respects to tbe merchandise tbe subject of United States v. Dalminter, Inc., R. W. Smith, 47 Cust. Ct. 577,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Dalminter, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API