Legal Opinion

Corrigan v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 24, 1954No. Reap. Dec. 8355; Entry Nos. 3009; 3770PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ekwall, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement are before the court pursuant to an order granting a motion for a rehearing and reconsideration of the decision and judgment of this court rendered on January 14, 1954 (E. H. Corrigan v. United States, 32 Cust. Ct. 561, Reap. Dec. 8278), and restoring the case to the calendar “for the purpose of permitting the parties to submit evidence establishing the cost of transportation from Laredo to the terminal in New York." E. H. Corrigan v. United States, 32 Cust. Ct. 599, Reap. Dec. 8295.

*541These cases are appeals for reappraisement of dehydrated garlic…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Marine Products Co.United States Customs Court · 1950
  2. Marine Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
  3. Universal Carloading & Distributing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
  4. Corrigan v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  5. Corrigan v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. CorriganUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  2. United States v. Dalminter, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1961
  3. Duroch Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  4. Samuel Shapiro & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API