Legal Opinion

City of Austin v. Austin National Bank of Austin

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1973No. B-3771PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

Austin National Bank, plaintiff and executor of the estate of Mrs. Mary May-field Gutsch, obtained a judgment in this declaratory action that Mrs. Gutsch intended by her will that the residue of her estate should be held in a perpetual charitable trust with the Austin National Bank as trustee and the Humane Society of Austin and Travis County as the beneficiary. The trial court also construed the will as giving to Ann Knight Hoey a choice of all tangible personalty found in the testatrix’ house at her death, except for two items specifically bequeathed to another person. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Haile v. HoltzclawTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Benson v. Greenville Nat. Exchange BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  3. Kettler v. AtkinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Gidley v. Lovenberg, AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  5. Atkinson v. KettlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Humane Society of Austin & Travis County v. Austin National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Beaty v. Bales, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984
  3. Hancock v. Krause, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  4. Matter of Estate of TayrienSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  5. Humane Society of Austin & Travis County v. Austin National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API