Royster Guano Co. v. Odum
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.
1. The right to attack a deed to realty, based on a valuable consideration, executed by a wife to her husband, on the ground that it was a sale of her separate estate and void under the provisions of the Civil Code (1910), § 3009, is personal to the wife, and such a deed can not be attacked upon such ground except by her or her privies in blood or estate. Scaife v. Scaife, 134 Ga. 1 (67 S. E. 408), and cit.; Munroe v. Baldwin, 145 Ga. 215 (3) (88 S. E. 947); Williams v. Rhodes, 149 Ga. 170 (99 S. E. 531). A wife’s judgment creditor for the price of goods sold to her is not her privy by blood…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Munroe v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Scaife v. ScaifeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
- Widincamp v. JamesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
3Cited by4 opinions
- Georgia Casualty Co. v. McRitchieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Thompson v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Ball v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Department of Revenue v. WardlawCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942