Legal Opinion

Royster Guano Co. v. Odum

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 17, 1929No. 6463PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. The right to attack a deed to realty, based on a valuable consideration, executed by a wife to her husband, on the ground that it was a sale of her separate estate and void under the provisions of the Civil Code (1910), § 3009, is personal to the wife, and such a deed can not be attacked upon such ground except by her or her privies in blood or estate. Scaife v. Scaife, 134 Ga. 1 (67 S. E. 408), and cit.; Munroe v. Baldwin, 145 Ga. 215 (3) (88 S. E. 947); Williams v. Rhodes, 149 Ga. 170 (99 S. E. 531). A wife’s judgment creditor for the price of goods sold to her is not her privy by blood…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Munroe v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  2. Scaife v. ScaifeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  4. Widincamp v. JamesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Georgia Casualty Co. v. McRitchieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  2. Thompson v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. Ball v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  4. Department of Revenue v. WardlawCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API