Widincamp v. James
Supreme Court of Georgia
Claim. Before Judge Rawlings. Tattnall superior court. October 3, 1906.
1Opinion of the CourtCobb, P. J.
1. When in a claim case the levy had been dismissed for the want of prosecution, and the case thereafter reinstated by the judge, it was not permissible for the claimant to make up an issue in the claim ease and have it determined whether the case was properly reinstated. If for any reason the order of reinstatement was irregular or erroneous, a formal motion should be made to review the order reinstating the case.
Submitted June 4, Decided August 14, 1907. Claim. Before Judge Rawlings. Tattnall superior court. October 3, 1906. W. T. Burlchalier, for plaintiff in error. O. L. Morgan, contra.
2.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Southern Mining Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Ray v. Atlanta Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Sanders v. PriceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1899
3Cited by3 opinions
- Royster Guano Co. v. OdumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
- Gormley v. CleavelandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Moseley v. BinfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924