Thompson v. Wright
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
Mrs. Thompson brought suit against Wright as administrator of the estate of Mrs. Cora Hendrix, deceased, to recover upon a note which had been executed by decedent to T. P. Hendrix. The note matured January 1, 1926, and was transferred *818after maturity to the plaintiff. There was an entry on it that it was for purchase-money for land designated. A defense interposed by the administrator was that the note, if made by his intestate, was void in that it was executed by her to her husband as a promise to pay the purchase-price of land sold by him to her, and that its execution had not been allowed…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Humphrey v. CopelandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
- Georgia Casualty Co. v. McRitchieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Hawes v. GlovesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Munroe v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Morris v. Murphey & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1895
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Thompson v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Thompson v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936