Legal Opinion

Powell-Kirby v. Spectrum Health

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided January 30, 2013No. Case No. 1:12-CV-132PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

GORDON J. QUIST, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Bridget Powell-Kirby, brought this claim against Defendant, Spectrum Health, for violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., alleging Defendant terminated her employment because she filed a Charge of Discrimination with the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Defendant has moved for summary judgment.1 For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant Defendant’s motion.

I. FACTS2

Defendant hired Plaintiff in 2004 as a Health…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Pram Nguyen v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  5. Mickey v. Zeidler Tool and Die Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Benison v. RossDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API