Legal Opinion
The Boeing Company v. Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, and Cegedur Societe De Transformation De L'ALuminum Pechiney
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 29, 1988No. 87-1347PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHER, Circuit Judge.
Cegedur Societe De Transformation De L’Aluminum Pechiney (Cegedur) appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, The Boeing Company v. Quigg, 2 USPQ2d 1723 (D.D.C.1987) [available on WEST-LAW, 1987 WL 13196], denying Cegedur’s motions for summary judgment and an award of costs and attorney fees and granting the joint motion of the Commissioner and The Boeing Company (Boeing) to remand a reexamination proceeding to the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) and to dismiss without prejudice Boeing’s appeal from the decision of the Board…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Rohm & Hass Texas, Inc. v. Ortiz Brothers Insulation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Penda Corporation (Now Trienda Corporation) v. The United States, and Cadillac Products, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- National Presto Industries, Inc. v. Dazey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Syntex (u.s.a.) Inc. v. U.S. Patent & Trademark OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Willis v. Government Accountability OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.