Legal Opinion
Willis v. Government Accountability Office
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 17, 2006No. 2005-6003PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge DYK.
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge BRYSON.
DYK, Circuit Judge.
Janice F. Willis (“Willis”), an attorney, appeals the decision of the Personnel Appeals Board (the “Board”) of the United States Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) declining under the fee-shifting provision of the Civil Service Reform Act, 5 U.S.C. § 7701(g)(1), to award the full amount of attorney’s fees requested by Willis and her former client Sandra P. Davis (“Davis”). Davis has not appealed. Because Willis lacks standing to contest the Board’s decision, we dismiss…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Manning v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Gonter v. Hunt Valve Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Rojas v. Two/Morrow Ideas Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2010
- Kawa v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- McCarty v. AstrueDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.