Legal Opinion
National Presto Industries, Inc. v. Dazey Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 6, 1997No. 96-1162PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
Dazey Corporation (Dazey) filed an “emergency motion” with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, seeking a declaration of its rights under a settlement agreement that had terminated its prior litigation with National Presto Industries, Inc. (Presto). After the district court ruled in Presto’s favor on the merits of the motion, Dazey moved to dismiss the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The district court concluded that it had improperly exercised jurisdiction over. Dazey’s motion and, accordingly,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-LarrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Jessup, Goble v. Luther, RobertCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- McAlpin v. Lexington 76 Auto Truck Stop, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- National City Golf Finance v. Golf Cars of MississCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Leland G. Neuberg and Joel G. Neuberg v. Michael Reese Hospital FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Perry v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.