Legal Opinion

United States v. Tarnopol

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 9, 1977No. Nos. 76-1542 to 76-1545PublishedCited by 104 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

MARIS, Circuit Judge.

The appellants, Nat Tarnopol, Peter Gar-ris, Irving Wiegan and Lee Shep, appeal from their convictions of violations of the federal mail fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1341 and of conspiracy to commit mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341, wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343, and fraud against the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371.

The facts of the case as they appear from the evidence viewed in the light most favorable to the government may be briefly summarized. See Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60, 62 S.Ct. 457, 86 L.Ed.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Spies v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. United States v. MazeSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by104 opinions

  1. Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United States v. Curtis J. Bernhardt, Michael F. McCarthy Harold T. Okahara, Jr., and Carl J. BernhardtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. RiccobeneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  4. McLaughlin v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Angelo Pepe and Thomas Miglionico, United States of America v. Albert Joseph Facchiano, Francis Santo, Paul SantoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API