Legal Opinion

United States v. Curtis J. Bernhardt, Michael F. McCarthy Harold T. Okahara, Jr., and Carl J. Bernhardt

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 8, 1988No. 85-1250PublishedCited by 319 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POOLE, Circuit Judge:

The United States appeals the district court’s dismissal of twenty-nine counts of a seventy-four-count indictment. The subject counts charged defendants Curtis Bernhardt, Carl Bernhardt, Michael McCarthy, Harold Okahara (collectively appellees), and Daniel Matsukage with conspiracy to violate the mail fraud and wire fraud statutes of the United States, 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1341, 1343 and 2. Sixty-five separate acts of mail fraud (Counts 2 through 66) and eight acts of wire fraud (Counts 67 through 74) were set forth. Upon the motion of the defendants and following the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by319 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. JohnstoneDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2003
  2. United States v. Errol F. Remsing and Jerry H. DefoorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. Tommy v. Greenhow v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George Paul SALEMO, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. Alex v. SteinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

314 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API