Legal Opinion
United States v. Angelo Pepe and Thomas Miglionico, United States of America v. Albert Joseph Facchiano, Francis Santo, Paul Santo
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided November 28, 1984No. 81-5453, 81-5965PublishedCited by 201 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge:
Albert “Chink” Facchiano, Thomas Miglionico, Angelo Pepe, Francis “Jigger” Santo, and Paul Santo were convicted under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1961-68 (1982), for conducting loan sharking activities in southern Florida. In this consolidated appeal, they question the legal sufficiency of the indictment to charge one of the RICO offenses and of the evidence to support their multiple convictions. They also question several of the trial judge’s rulings made prior to, during, and after the trial.
We conclude that the…
2Cases cited105 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by201 opinions
- United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez Celestino Orlando Estevez Amado Raphael Leon Adalberto Herrera and Menelao Orlando EstevezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. PungitoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Marvin BakerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
196 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.