Legal Opinion

Robert Neff & Sons, Inc. v. City of Lancaster

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1970No. 69-62PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The specific question of law presented by this case is whether plaintiffs have pleaded facts sufficient to state a cause of action under the applicable laws of Ohio.

Plaintiffs base their claim upon the provisions of Section 723.01, Revised Code:

“Municipal corporations shall have special power to regulate the use of the streets. The legislative authority of such municipal corporation shall have the care, super*33vision, and control of public highways, streets, avenues, alleys, sidewalks, public grounds, bridges, aqueducts, and viaducts within the municipal corporation, and shall cause them to he…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fankhauser v. City of MansfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Meridian City Lines v. BakerMississippi Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Galloway v. City of WinchesterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  4. Embler v. . Town of WallkillNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Yackee v. Village of NapoleonOhio Supreme Court · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Helton v. Scioto County Board of CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Vogel v. WellsOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Franks v. LopezOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Manufacturer's National Bank v. Erie County Road CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Harp v. City of Cleveland HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API