Legal Opinion
Robert Neff & Sons, Inc. v. City of Lancaster
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided January 14, 1970No. 69-62PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.
The specific question of law presented by this case is whether plaintiffs have pleaded facts sufficient to state a cause of action under the applicable laws of Ohio.
Plaintiffs base their claim upon the provisions of Section 723.01, Revised Code:
“Municipal corporations shall have special power to regulate the use of the streets. The legislative authority of such municipal corporation shall have the care, super*33vision, and control of public highways, streets, avenues, alleys, sidewalks, public grounds, bridges, aqueducts, and viaducts within the municipal corporation, and shall cause them to he…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fankhauser v. City of MansfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- Meridian City Lines v. BakerMississippi Supreme Court · 1949
- Galloway v. City of WinchesterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
- Embler v. . Town of WallkillNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Yackee v. Village of NapoleonOhio Supreme Court · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Helton v. Scioto County Board of CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- Vogel v. WellsOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Franks v. LopezOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Manufacturer's National Bank v. Erie County Road CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Harp v. City of Cleveland HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.